The Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of American History has recently removed references to former President Donald Trump's two impeachments from its exhibit titled "The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden." This decision has sparked controversy and raised questions about political influence on historical narratives.
The Smithsonian clarified that these mentions were intended to be temporary and part of a rotating content approach. The removal came amid renewed scrutiny after Trump signed an executive order in March 2025 aimed at eliminating what he considers "improper ideology" from the Smithsonian’s museums and associated programs.
Historians and scholars have expressed concern over the potential manipulation of historical accounts. Julian Zelizer and Jason Stanley warn that rewriting or omitting parts of history undermines public understanding and democratic accountability. The debate touches on the broader question of whether museums should document history objectively or frame it to support national identity.
Former Nixon Library director Timothy Naftali expressed disappointment, advocating for integrity in historical presentation. The situation underscores the ongoing tension between truth and narrative in public memory, particularly when powerful figures actively seek to shape their own legacies.
This development highlights the delicate balance museums must maintain between curating exhibits that reflect historical facts and navigating the pressures of political influence. As the Smithsonian plans a full update of its presidential impeachment exhibits in the future, the institution faces the challenge of presenting a comprehensive and unbiased account of American history.
