The Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of American History has recently removed references to former President Donald Trump's two impeachments from its exhibit titled "The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden." This decision has sparked controversy and raised questions about political influence in the curation of historical narratives.
The Smithsonian clarified that these mentions were intended to be temporary and part of a rotating content approach. The removal aligns with a broader initiative by the Trump administration to eliminate what it considers "improper ideology" from federal institutions. In March 2025, President Trump signed an executive order aimed at promoting narratives that emphasize American "greatness" and minimize divisive subjects in public institutions and museums.
Critics argue that this move reflects an effort to manipulate how history is remembered, reminiscent of authoritarian practices where political leaders control historical accounts to bolster legitimacy. Historians and scholars warn that rewriting or omitting parts of history undermines public understanding and democratic accountability.
The debate touches on the broader question of whether museums should document history objectively or frame it to support national identity. Former Nixon Library director Timothy Naftali expressed disappointment, advocating for integrity in historical presentation.
This situation underscores the ongoing tension between truth and narrative in public memory, particularly when powerful figures actively seek to shape their own legacies. The Smithsonian's decision has ignited a wider conversation about the role of political influence in curating historical exhibitions and the importance of preserving an accurate and comprehensive record of the past.
